Micro-entries: Encouraging Deeper Evaluation of Mental Models Over Time for Interactive Data Systems
Jeremy E. Block, Eric D. Ragan

TL;DR
This paper reviews methods for evaluating how users develop and update their mental models over time when interacting with data visualization systems, emphasizing deeper, structured insights into user understanding.
Contribution
It introduces guidelines for longitudinal mental model evaluation, highlighting the importance of capturing evolving user understanding in interactive data systems.
Findings
Structured, time-ordered insights reveal mental model evolution
Asking users to describe their understanding guides discovery
Evaluation methods should focus on ongoing mental model changes
Abstract
Many interactive data systems combine visual representations of data with embedded algorithmic support for automation and data exploration. To effectively support transparent and explainable data systems, it is important for researchers and designers to know how users understand the system. We discuss the evaluation of users' mental models of system logic. Mental models are challenging to capture and analyze. While common evaluation methods aim to approximate the user's final mental model after a period of system usage, user understanding continuously evolves as users interact with a system over time. In this paper, we review many common mental model measurement techniques, discuss tradeoffs, and recommend methods for deeper, more meaningful evaluation of mental models when using interactive data analysis and visualization systems. We present guidelines for evaluating mental models over…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
