Confusing Head-On Collisions with Precessing Intermediate-Mass Binary Black Hole Mergers
Juan Calder\'on Bustillo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Alejandro, Torres-Forn\'e, Jos\'e A. Font

TL;DR
This paper reveals a degeneracy in gravitational-wave signals between precessing quasi-circular black-hole mergers and head-on collisions, complicating the interpretation of observed signals and potentially affecting mass estimates of detected events.
Contribution
It demonstrates that head-on collisions can be mistaken for precessing mergers in current models, highlighting the need for specialized waveform models and priors to distinguish them.
Findings
Head-on mergers can mimic precessing signals at typical LIGO SNRs.
Misclassification can lead to incorrect mass and distance estimates.
Implications for interpreting GW190521 and similar detections.
Abstract
We report a degeneracy between the gravitational-wave signals from quasi-circular precessing black-hole mergers and those from extremely eccentric mergers, namely head-on collisions. Performing model selection on numerically simulated signals of head-on collisions using models for quasi-circular binaries we find that, for signal-to-noise ratios of 15 and 25, typical of Advanced LIGO observations, head-on mergers with respective total masses of and would be identified as precessing quasi-circular intermediate-mass black hole binaries, located at a much larger distance. Ruling out the head-on scenario would require to perform model selection using currently nonexistent waveform models for head-on collisions, together with the application of astrophysically motivated priors on the (rare) occurrence of those events. We show that in situations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
