Flexible imitation suppresses epidemics through better vaccination
Soya Miyoshi, Marko Jusup, Petter Holme

TL;DR
This paper presents a minimalistic model showing that flexible decision-making in vaccination, based on social influence and learning from experience, can enhance vaccine uptake and reduce epidemic severity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel model combining game theory, network theory, and epidemic modeling to study adaptive vaccination decisions based on social neighborhood responses.
Findings
Flexibility in decision strategies increases vaccination rates.
Longer memory of past outbreaks improves epidemic control.
Limited initial imitation promotes better vaccination outcomes.
Abstract
The decision of whether or not to vaccinate is a complex one. It involves the contribution both to a social good -- herd immunity -- and to one's own well being. It is informed by social influence, personal experience, education, and mass media. In our work, we investigate a situation in which individuals make their choice based on how social neighbourhood responded to previous epidemics. We do this by proposing a minimalistic model using components from game theory, network theory and the modelling of epidemic spreading, and opinion dynamics. Individuals can use the information about the neighbourhood in two ways -- either they follow the majority or the best-performing neighbour. Furthermore, we let individuals learn which of these two decision-making strategies to follow from their experience. Our results show that the flexibility of individuals to chose how to integrate information…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
