TL;DR
NATS-Bench provides a comprehensive, standardized benchmark for evaluating NAS algorithms across architecture topology and size, enabling fair comparison and fostering research in neural architecture search.
Contribution
It introduces a unified benchmark with extensive search spaces for topology and size, allowing consistent evaluation of NAS algorithms across datasets.
Findings
Benchmark includes 15,625 neural cell candidates for topology.
Benchmark includes 32,768 candidates for architecture size.
Benchmark facilitates fair comparison of 13 state-of-the-art NAS algorithms.
Abstract
Neural architecture search (NAS) has attracted a lot of attention and has been illustrated to bring tangible benefits in a large number of applications in the past few years. Architecture topology and architecture size have been regarded as two of the most important aspects for the performance of deep learning models and the community has spawned lots of searching algorithms for both aspects of the neural architectures. However, the performance gain from these searching algorithms is achieved under different search spaces and training setups. This makes the overall performance of the algorithms to some extent incomparable and the improvement from a sub-module of the searching model unclear. In this paper, we propose NATS-Bench, a unified benchmark on searching for both topology and size, for (almost) any up-to-date NAS algorithm. NATS-Bench includes the search space of 15,625 neural…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
