Historical and philosophical reflections on the Einstein-de Sitter model
Cormac O'Raifeartaigh, Michael O'Keeffe, Simon Mitton

TL;DR
This paper reflects on the historical and philosophical significance of the Einstein-de Sitter model, highlighting its role as a simple, benchmark cosmological model that influenced 20th-century big bang theories.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the original 1932 paper, emphasizing its novelty in modeling a dynamic universe without cosmological constant or curvature.
Findings
First specific analysis of a dynamic cosmology without cosmological constant or curvature
Established a simple relation between cosmic expansion and matter density
Served as a foundational benchmark in big bang cosmology
Abstract
We present some historical and philosophical reflections on the paper "On the Relation Between the Expansion and the Mean Density of the Universe", published by Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter in 1932. In this famous work, Einstein and de Sitter considered a relativistic model of the expanding universe with both the cosmological constant and the curvature of space set to zero. Although the Einstein-deSitter model went on to serve as a standard model in 'big bang' cosmology for many years, we note that the authors do not explicitly consider the evolution of the cosmos in the paper. Indeed, the mathematics of the article are quite puzzling to modern eyes. We consider claims that the paper was neither original nor important; we find that, by providing the first specific analysis of the case of a dynamic cosmology without a cosmological constant or spatial curvature, the authors…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
