Introducing Representations of Facial Affect in Automated Multimodal Deception Detection

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that continuous facial affect representations significantly improve automated deception detection accuracy in high-stakes real-world scenarios, outperforming previous methods without facial affect features.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach using deep neural network-derived facial affect features for deception detection, achieving state-of-the-art results in real-world courtroom data.

Findings

Unimodal facial affect models achieved 80% AUC.

Multimodal approach reached 91% AUC, surpassing previous methods.

Significant differences in facial affect between truthful and deceptive speakers.

Abstract

Automated deception detection systems can enhance health, justice, and security in society by helping humans detect deceivers in high-stakes situations across medical and legal domains, among others. This paper presents a novel analysis of the discriminative power of dimensional representations of facial affect for automated deception detection, along with interpretable features from visual, vocal, and verbal modalities. We used a video dataset of people communicating truthfully or deceptively in real-world, high-stakes courtroom situations. We leveraged recent advances in automated emotion recognition in-the-wild by implementing a state-of-the-art deep neural network trained on the Aff-Wild database to extract continuous representations of facial valence and facial arousal from speakers. We experimented with unimodal Support Vector Machines (SVM) and SVM-based multimodal fusion methods to identify effective features, modalities, and modeling approaches for detecting deception. Unimodal models trained on facial affect achieved an AUC of 80%, and facial affect contributed towards the highest-performing multimodal approach (adaptive boosting) that achieved an AUC of 91% when tested on speakers who were not part of training sets. This approach achieved a higher AUC than existing automated machine learning approaches that used interpretable visual, vocal, and verbal features to detect deception in this dataset, but did not use facial affect. Across all videos, deceptive and truthful speakers exhibited significant differences in facial valence and facial arousal, contributing computational support to existing psychological theories on affect and deception. The demonstrated importance of facial affect in our models informs and motivates the future development of automated, affect-aware machine learning approaches for modeling and detecting deception and other social behaviors in-the-wild.