TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark dataset and standardized testbed for evaluating and comparing the overall performance of autonomous ground navigation systems in obstacle-rich environments.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic, standardized benchmark with 300 environments and difficulty metrics for holistic ground robot navigation evaluation.
Findings
Benchmark dataset with 300 environments and difficulty metrics.
Systematic comparison of navigation systems possible.
Potential use as a cost function and curriculum for navigation algorithms.
Abstract
Metric ground navigation addresses the problem of autonomously moving a robot from one point to another in an obstacle-occupied planar environment in a collision-free manner. It is one of the most fundamental capabilities of intelligent mobile robots. This paper presents a standardized testbed with a set of environments and metrics to benchmark difficulty of different scenarios and performance of different systems of metric ground navigation. Current benchmarks focus on individual components of mobile robot navigation, such as perception and state estimation, but the navigation performance as a whole is rarely measured in a systematic and standardized fashion. As a result, navigation systems are usually tested and compared in an ad hoc manner, such as in one or two manually chosen environments. The introduced benchmark provides a general testbed for ground robot navigation in a metric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
