Maximal singlet fraction vs. maximal achievable fidelity as proper entanglement measures
Hermann L. Albrecht Q., Douglas F. Mundarain

TL;DR
This paper compares different entanglement measures for 2-qubit states, showing that maximal achievable fidelity aligns better with concurrence than maximal singlet fraction, highlighting its suitability as an entanglement measure.
Contribution
It demonstrates that maximal achievable fidelity is a more consistent entanglement measure than maximal singlet fraction for certain 2-qubit states.
Findings
MAF aligns better with concurrence than MSF
MSF and concurrence can behave oppositely
MAF satisfies key features of a good entanglement measure
Abstract
We review some parametric families of 2-qubit states for which concurrence and maximal singlet fraction (MSF) have different and even opposite behaviour. For states considered in this work, maximal achievable fidelity (MAF), a quantity derived by Verstraete and Verschelde in 2003, shows a better agreement with concurrence and complies with important features required to be considered a good entanglement measure.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
