On the Anthropogenic and Natural Injection of Matter into Earth's Atmosphere
Leonard Schulz, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier

TL;DR
This paper compares human-made and natural matter entering Earth's atmosphere, highlighting the increasing significance of anthropogenic debris due to satellite activities and potential impacts on atmospheric and terrestrial environments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of natural and anthropogenic mass fluxes into Earth's atmosphere, emphasizing future risks from satellite constellations.
Findings
Anthropogenic material currently accounts for about 2.8% of natural mass flux.
Future satellite constellations could raise anthropogenic contribution to nearly 40%.
Anthropogenic injection of metals and aerosols may significantly impact Earth's atmosphere.
Abstract
Every year, more and more objects are sent to space. While staying in orbit at high altitudes, objects at low altitudes reenter the atmosphere, mostly disintegrating and adding material to the upper atmosphere. The increasing number of countries with space programs, advancing commercialization, and ambitious satellite constellation projects raise concerns about space debris in the future and will continuously increase the mass flux into the atmosphere. In this study, we compare the mass influx of human-made (anthropogenic) objects to the natural mass flux into Earth's atmosphere due to meteoroids, originating from solar system objects like asteroids and comets. The current and near future significance of anthropogenic mass sources is evaluated, considering planned and already partially installed large satellite constellations. Detailed information about the mass, composition, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
