Empirical Likelihood Weighted Estimation of Average Treatment Effects
Yuanyao Tan, Xialing Wen, Wei Liang, Ying Yan

TL;DR
This paper introduces an empirical likelihood weighted estimator for the average treatment effect in randomized trials, which is efficient, robust, and separates covariate adjustment from outcome analysis.
Contribution
It proposes a novel ELW estimator that is semiparametric efficient, double robust, and maintains objectivity by decoupling covariate adjustment from outcome analysis.
Findings
The ELW estimator is semiparametric efficient.
It exhibits double robustness under missing at random outcomes.
Simulations confirm superior performance over existing methods.
Abstract
There has been growing attention on how to effectively and objectively use covariate information when the primary goal is to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). In this paper, we propose an effective weighting approach to extract covariate information based on the empirical likelihood (EL) method. The resulting two-sample empirical likelihood weighted (ELW) estimator includes two classes of weights, which are obtained from a constrained empirical likelihood estimation procedure, where the covariate information is effectively incorporated into the form of general estimating equations. Furthermore, this ELW approach separates the estimation of ATE from the analysis of the covariate-outcome relationship, which implies that our approach maintains objectivity. In theory, we show that the proposed ELW estimator is semiparametric efficient. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
