Models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations and black hole spin estimates in Galactic microquasars

TL;DR

This study examines how non-geodesic pressure forces in accretion disks affect high-frequency QPO models and black hole spin estimates in Galactic microquasars, finding some models are incompatible with data and discussing implications for spin measurements.

Contribution

It analyzes the impact of pressure forces on QPO models and black hole spin estimates, identifying models incompatible with observations and proposing implications for spin measurements.

Findings

Two models are incompatible with the data.

Some models show only minor changes in spin estimates.

The proposed neutron star QPO model suggests higher black hole spins.

Abstract

We explore the influence of non-geodesic pressure forces that are present in an accretion disk on the frequencies of its axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric epicyclic oscillation modes. {We discuss its implications for models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) that have been observed in the X-ray flux of accreting black holes (BHs) in the three Galactic microquasars, GRS 1915+105, GRO J1655$-$40 and XTE J1550$-$564. We focus on previously considered QPO models that deal with low azimuthal number epicyclic modes, $\lvert m \rvert \leq 2$, and outline the consequences for the estimations of BH spin, $a\in[0,1]$.} For four out of six examined models, we find only small, rather insignificant changes compared to the geodesic case. For the other two models, on the other hand, there is a fair increase of the estimated upper limit on the spin. Regarding the QPO model's falsifiability, we find that one particular model from the examined set is incompatible with the data. If the microquasar's spectral spin estimates that point to $a>0.65$ were fully confirmed, two more QPO models would be ruled out. Moreover, if two very different values of the spin, such as $a\approx 0.65$ in GRO J1655$-$40 vs. $a\approx 1$ in GRS 1915+105, were confirmed, all the models except one would remain unsupported by our results. Finally, we discuss the implications for a model recently proposed in the context of neutron star (NS) QPOs as a disk-oscillation-based modification of the relativistic precession model. This model provides overall better fits of the NS data and predicts more realistic values of the NS mass compared to the relativistic precession model. We conclude that it also implies a significantly higher upper limit on the microquasar's BH spin ($a\sim 0.75$ vs. $a\sim 0.55$).