Evaluation of scatter rejection and correction performance of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam computed tomography

TL;DR

This study evaluates the effectiveness of 2D antiscatter grids in cone beam CT for scatter rejection and correction, demonstrating improved image accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio through experimental prototypes and novel sampling methods.

Contribution

It introduces a grid-based scatter sampling method combined with 2D ASGs, enhancing scatter correction and image quality in CBCT beyond previous approaches.

Findings

Higher grid ratios reduce CT number variation.

2D ASGs improve contrast-to-noise ratio significantly.

Combined scatter rejection and correction further improve image accuracy.

Abstract

Purpose: We have been investigating 2D antiscatter grids (2D ASG) to reduce scatter fluence and improve image quality in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this work, two different aspects of 2D ASGs, their scatter rejection and correction capability, were investigated in CBCT experiments. To correct residual scatter transmitted through the 2D ASG, it was used as a scatter measurement device with a novel method: grid-based scatter sampling. Methods: Three focused 2D ASG prototypes with grid ratios of 8, 12, and 16 were developed for linac-mounted CBCT geometry. In the first phase, 2D ASGs were used as a scatter rejection device, and the effect of grid ratio on CT number accuracy and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluated in CBCT images. In the second phase, the grid-based scatter sampling method was implemented. The percent change in CT numbers was measured by changing the phantom size from head to pelvis configuration.Results: When 2D ASG was used as a scatter rejection device, CT number variation due to change in phantom dimensions was reduced from 23% to 2 - 6%. A grid ratio of 16 yielded the lowest CT number variation. All three 2D ASGs yielded improvement in CNR, up to a factor of two in pelvis-sized phantoms. When 2D ASG prototypes were used for both scatter rejection and correction, CT number variations were reduced further, to 1.3 - 2.6%. Conclusions: When 2D ASG was used solely as a scatter rejection device, substantial improvement in CT number accuracy could be achieved by increasing the grid ratio. 2D ASGs could also provide significant CNR improvement even at lower grid ratios. When 2D ASG was used in conjunction with the grid-based scatter sampling method, it provided further improvement in CT number accuracy, irrespective of the grid ratio, while preserving 2D ASG's capacity to improve CNR.