TL;DR
This paper introduces three pleiotropy-robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization, improving causal inference accuracy when multiple risk factors are involved, especially under varying levels of pleiotropy.
Contribution
The paper develops and compares three novel pleiotropy-robust methods for multivariable Mendelian randomization, addressing a gap in existing approaches for multiple risk factors.
Findings
MVMR-Robust outperforms existing methods with low pleiotropy.
MVMR-Lasso achieves lowest mean squared error at high pleiotropy.
MVMR-Median provides reliable estimates up to moderate pleiotropy.
Abstract
Mendelian randomization is a powerful tool for inferring the presence, or otherwise, of causal effects from observational data. However, the nature of genetic variants is such that pleiotropy remains a barrier to valid causal effect estimation. There are many options in the literature for pleiotropy robust methods when studying the effects of a single risk factor on an outcome. However, there are few pleiotropy robust methods in the multivariable setting, that is, when there are multiple risk factors of interest. In this paper we introduce three methods which build on common approaches in the univariable setting: MVMR-Robust; MVMR-Median; and MVMR-Lasso. We discuss the properties of each of these methods and examine their performance in comparison to existing approaches in a simulation study. MVMR-Robust is shown to outperform existing outlier robust approaches when there are low levels…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
