Performance of superadiabatic stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in the presence of dissipation and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dephasing
Kostas Blekos, Dionisis Stefanatos, and Emmanuel Paspalakis

TL;DR
This study evaluates the robustness of superadiabatic STIRAP protocols with Gaussian and sin-cos pulses against dissipation and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise, revealing conditions for optimal population transfer and noise resilience.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of superadiabatic STIRAP performance under realistic noise and dissipation, highlighting the effects of pulse amplitude, delay, and noise correlation time.
Findings
Small pulse amplitudes favor direct population transfer via counterdiabatic pulses.
Large pulse amplitudes favor conventional STIRAP pathways, enhancing robustness.
Gaussian protocol with optimized delay performs well under severe noise.
Abstract
In this paper we evaluate the performance of two superadiabatic stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) protocols derived from Gaussian and sin-cos pulses, under dissipation and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck noise in the energy levels. We find that for small amplitudes of Stokes and pump pulses, the population transfer is mainly achieved directly through the counterdiabatic pulse, while for large amplitudes the conventional STIRAP path dominates. This kind of "hedging" leads to a remarkable robustness against dissipation in the lossy intermediate state. For small pulse amplitudes and increasing noise correlation time the performance is decreased, since the dominant counterdiabatic pulse is affected more, while for large pulse amplitudes, where the STIRAP path dominates, the efficiency is degraded more for intermediate correlation times (compared to the pulse duration). For the Gaussian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
