#ISIS vs #ActionCountersTerrorism: A Computational Analysis of Extremist and Counter-extremist Twitter Narratives
Fatima Zahrah, Jason R. C. Nurse, Michael Goldsmith

TL;DR
This study uses computational methods to analyze and compare the narratives of pro-ISIS and counter-extremism Twitter accounts, revealing different dissemination strategies and psychological motivations behind their messages.
Contribution
It provides a detailed computational analysis of extremist and counter-extremist social media narratives, highlighting strategic differences and psychological factors.
Findings
Pro-extremist accounts use distinct hashtag strategies.
Counter-extremist accounts employ different dissemination tactics.
Narratives differ in psychological motivation and messaging strategies.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of cyberspace has greatly facilitated the strategic shift of traditional crimes to online platforms. This has included malicious actors, such as extremist organisations, making use of online networks to disseminate propaganda and incite violence through radicalising individuals. In this article, we seek to advance current research by exploring how supporters of extremist organisations craft and disseminate their content, and how posts from counter-extremism agencies compare to them. In particular, this study will apply computational techniques to analyse the narratives of various pro-extremist and counter-extremist Twitter accounts, and investigate how the psychological motivation behind the messages compares between pro-ISIS and counter-extremism narratives. Our findings show that pro-extremist accounts often use different strategies to disseminate content (such as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
