Response to Comment on Widely tunable compact terahertz gas lasers
Paul Chevalier, Arman Amirzhan, Fan Wang, Marco Piccardo, Steven G., Johnson, Federico Capasso, Henry O. Everitt

TL;DR
This paper corrects a parameter in a previously published model for tunable terahertz gas lasers, clarifies the model's accuracy, and addresses concerns raised by prior comments, reinforcing the validity of their original findings.
Contribution
The authors correct a key parameter in their previous model and demonstrate that their simplified power estimation is more accurate than alternative models.
Findings
Corrected the parameter value in the laser performance table.
Validated the simplified power model as more accurate.
Addressed and resolved concerns from prior technical comments.
Abstract
We recently demonstrated a widely tunable THz molecular laser and reported mathematical formulas and a table for comparing how various molecules would perform as such lasers (Chevalier et al., Science, 15 November 2019, p. 856-860). Here we correct the value of a single parameter used to calculate the table (see Erratum for Chevalier et al.), thereby eliminating the concerns raised by Lampin and Barbieri (Lampin et al., arXiv:2004.04422). We also show that our simplified model for the output THz power is a better approximation than the alternative one proposed in the technical comment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy and Laser Applications · Laser Design and Applications · Strong Light-Matter Interactions
