Assessing Impact of Unobserved Confounders with Sensitivity Index Probabilities through Pseudo-Experiments
Beilin Jia (1), Donglin Zeng (1), Qing Yang (2), Wei Pan (2) ((1), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, (2) Duke University)

TL;DR
This paper introduces nonparametric indices to measure the influence of unobserved confounders in causal inference, validated through pseudo-experiments and real-world data, aiming to improve understanding of confounding effects.
Contribution
The study proposes novel nonparametric indices for assessing unobserved confounders' impact, validated via pseudo-experiments and real data, advancing causal inference methodology.
Findings
Indices reflect true confounder impact
Validated through pseudo-experiments
Applicable to real-world data
Abstract
Unobserved confounders are a long-standing issue in causal inference using propensity score methods. This study proposed nonparametric indices to quantify the impact of unobserved confounders through pseudo-experiments with an application to real-world data. The study finding suggests that the proposed indices can reflect the true impact of confounders. It is hoped that this study will lead to further discussion on this important issue and help move the science of causal inference forward.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
