Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry
Philipp Arras, Hertzog L. Bester, Richard A. Perley, Reimar Leike,, Oleg Smirnov, R\"udiger Westermann, Torsten A. En{\ss}lin

TL;DR
This paper introduces 'resolve', a Bayesian imaging algorithm for radio interferometry that addresses CLEAN's limitations, providing super-resolution, uncertainty quantification, and reduced dependence on human choices, demonstrated on VLA data of Cygnus A.
Contribution
The paper presents 'resolve', a novel Bayesian imaging method that overcomes CLEAN's shortcomings, offering super-resolution and uncertainty estimates in radio interferometric imaging.
Findings
resolve achieves super-resolution in radio images
It provides uncertainty quantification for flux estimates
Noise correction factors vary between 0.4 and 429
Abstract
CLEAN, the commonly employed imaging algorithm in radio interferometry, suffers from a number of shortcomings: in its basic version it does not have the concept of diffuse flux, and the common practice of convolving the CLEAN components with the CLEAN beam erases the potential for super-resolution; it does not output uncertainty information; it produces images with unphysical negative flux regions; and its results are highly dependent on the so-called weighting scheme as well as on any human choice of CLEAN masks to guiding the imaging. Here, we present the Bayesian imaging algorithm resolve which solves the above problems and naturally leads to super-resolution. We take a VLA observation of Cygnus~A at four different frequencies and image it with single-scale CLEAN, multi-scale CLEAN and resolve. Alongside the sky brightness distribution resolve estimates a baseline-dependent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
