Parity and CP operations for Majorana neutrinos

TL;DR

This paper examines the parity and CP symmetry definitions for Majorana neutrinos, demonstrating their equivalence and consistency within various models, despite different initial parity operation choices and the presence of CP violation.

Contribution

It clarifies the relationship between different parity definitions for Majorana neutrinos and shows their physical equivalence in neutrino models, resolving compatibility issues.

Findings

Both parity choices lead to equivalent descriptions of Majorana neutrinos.

Majorana neutrinos can be characterized by CP symmetry despite P and C breaking.

The phase freedom in Majorana neutrinos ensures consistent CP definitions.

Abstract

The parity transformation law of the fermion field $\psi(x)$ is usually defined by the "$\gamma^{0}$-parity" $\psi^{p}(t,-\vec{x}) = \gamma^{0}\psi(t,-\vec{x})$ with eigenvalues $\pm 1$, while the "$i\gamma^{0}$-parity" $\psi^{p}(t,-\vec{x})=i\gamma^{0}\psi(t,-\vec{x})$ is required for the Majorana fermion. The compatibility issues of these two parity laws arise in generic fermion number violating theories where a general class of Majorana fermions appear. In the case of Majorana neutrinos constructed from chiral neutrinos in an extension of the Standard Model, the Majorana neutrinos can be characterized by CP symmetry although C and P are separately broken. It is then shown that either choice of the parity operation, $\gamma^{0}$ or $i\gamma^{0}$, in the level of the starting fermions gives rise to the consistent and physically equivalent descriptions of emergent Majorana neutrinos both for Weinberg's model of neutrinos and for a general class of seesaw models. The mechanism of this equivalence is that the Majorana neutrino constructed from a chiral neutrino, which satisfies the classical Majorana condition $\psi(x)=C\overline{\psi(x)}^{T}$, allows the phase freedom $\psi(x)=e^{i\alpha}\nu_{L}(x) + e^{-i\alpha}C\overline{\nu_{L}(x)}^{T}$ with $\alpha=0\ {\rm or}\ \pi/4$ that accounts for the phase coming from the different definitions of parity for $\nu_{L}(x)$ and ensures the consistent definitions of CP symmetry $({\cal CP})\psi(x)({\cal CP})^{\dagger}= \pm i\gamma^{0}\psi(t,-\vec{x})$.