The effect of data quality and model parameters on the quantitative phase analysis of X-ray diffraction data by the Rietveld method
Matthew R. Rowles

TL;DR
This study investigates how data quality and model parameters influence the accuracy of quantitative phase analysis in X-ray diffraction using the Rietveld method, providing guidelines for best practices.
Contribution
It offers new insights into the impact of data quality and model parameters on Rietveld analysis and proposes minimum standards for data collection and analysis.
Findings
Data quality significantly affects QPA accuracy.
Optimal model parameters improve analysis reliability.
Recommendations for minimum data standards are provided.
Abstract
The quality of X-ray powder diffraction data and the number and type of refinable parameters have been examined with respect to their effect on quantitative phase analysis (QPA) by the Rietveld method using data collected from two samples from the QPA round robin [Madsen et al. J. Appl. Cryst. (2001), 34, 409-26]. From these analyses of these best-case-scenario specimens, a series of recommendations for minimum standards of data collection and analysis are proposed. It is hoped that these will aid new QPA-by-Rietveld users in their analyses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
