Synchronisation and calibration of the 24-modules J-PET prototype with 300~mm axial field of view
P. Moskal, T. Bednarski, Sz. Niedzwiecki, M. Silarski, E. Czerwinski,, T. Kozik, J. Chhokar, M. Ba{\l}a, C. Curceanu, R. Del Grande, M. Dadgar, K., Dulski, A. Gajos, M. Gorgol, N. Gupta-Sharma, B. C. Hiesmayr, B. Jasinska, K., Kacprzak, L. Kaplon, H. Karimi, D. Kisielewska

TL;DR
This paper presents the development and calibration of a 24-module J-PET prototype with a 300mm axial field-of-view, demonstrating promising results for cost-effective total-body PET imaging.
Contribution
It introduces new calibration methods for a digital, triggerless data acquisition system in a plastic scintillator-based PET prototype.
Findings
Achieved coincidence resolving time of 490 ps
Position reconstruction accuracy of 18 mm
Successful calibration of time, thresholds, and gain
Abstract
Research conducted in the framework of the J-PET project aims to develop a cost-effective total-body positron emission tomography scanner. As a first step on the way to construct a full-scale J-PET tomograph from long strips of plastic scintillators, a 24-strip prototype was built and tested. The prototype consists of detection modules arranged axially forming a cylindrical diagnostic chamber with the inner diameter of 360 mm and the axial field-of-view of 300 mm. Promising perspectives for a low-cost construction of a total-body PET scanner are opened due to an axial arrangement of strips of plastic scintillators, wchich have a small light attenuation, superior timing properties, and the possibility of cost-effective increase of the axial field-of-view. The presented prototype comprises dedicated solely digital front-end electronic circuits and a triggerless data acquisition system…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
