Widely Reused and Shared, Infrequently Updated, and Sometimes Inherited: A Holistic View of PIN Authentication in Digital Lives and Beyond
Hassan Khan, Jason Ceci, Jonah Stegman, Adam J. Aviv and, Rozita Dara, Ravi Kuber

TL;DR
This study explores how users choose, share, reuse, and update PINs across various assets, revealing that memorability often outweighs security concerns and that PINs are rarely updated even after compromise.
Contribution
It provides a holistic view of PIN usage behaviors, highlighting the prevalence of PIN reuse, inheritance, and the lack of updates, with insights for improving human-device security interactions.
Findings
Memorability is the primary criterion for PIN choice.
PIN updating is infrequent, even after compromise.
Users often reuse and inherit PINs without proper updates.
Abstract
Personal Identification Numbers (PINs) are widely used as an access control mechanism for digital assets (e.g., smartphones), financial assets (e.g., ATM cards), and physical assets (e.g., locks for garage doors or homes). Using semi-structured interviews (n=35), participants reported on PIN usage for different types of assets, including how users choose, share, inherit, and reuse PINs, as well as behaviour following the compromise of a PIN. We find that memorability is the most important criterion when choosing a PIN, more so than security or concerns of reuse. Updating or changing a PIN is very uncommon, even when a PIN is compromised. Participants reported sharing PINs for one type of asset with acquaintances but inadvertently reused them for other assets, thereby subjecting themselves to potential risks. Participants also reported using PINs originally set by previous homeowners for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
