Compact elliptical galaxies in different local environments: a mixture of galaxies with different origins?
Suk Kim, Hyunjin Jeong, Soo-Chang Rey, Youngdae Lee, Jaehyun Lee,, Seok-Joo Joo, Hak-Sub Kim

TL;DR
This study analyzes the stellar populations of 138 compact elliptical galaxies in the local universe, revealing two distinct formation channels linked to their environment and progenitor mass, based on spectral analysis from SDSS data.
Contribution
It identifies two different origins for compact elliptical galaxies, supported by stellar population differences and environmental context, advancing understanding of their formation mechanisms.
Findings
cE(w)s have higher metallicity and alpha enhancement than cE(w/o)s.
No significant age difference between cE(w)s and cE(w/o)s.
cE(w)s deviate from the typical mass-metallicity relation, unlike cE(w/o)s.
Abstract
We present the stellar populations of 138 compact elliptical galaxies (cEs) in the redshift range of using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR12. Our cEs are divided into those with [cE(w)] and without [cE(w/o)] a bright ( mag) host galaxy. We investigated the stellar population properties of cEs based on the Lick line indices extracted from SDSS spectra. cE(w)s show [Z/H] and \afe\ distributions skewed toward higher values compared to those of the cE(w/o)s. No statistically significant difference in age distribution was found between the cE(w)s and cE(w/o)s. In the mass-metallicity distribution, cE(w)s deviate from the relation observed for early-type galaxies at a given stellar mass, whereas cE(w/o)s conform to the relation. Based on the different features in the stellar populations of cE(w)s and cE(w/o)s, we can propose two different cE formation channels…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
