Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart
Duncan Watson-Parris

TL;DR
This paper discusses the differences between weather and climate modeling, emphasizing how machine learning approaches should be tailored to each domain's specific needs and challenges.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinct requirements for ML emulation in weather versus climate modeling and highlights recent advances in climate model emulation techniques.
Findings
Climate emulation focuses on steady-state responses.
Weather emulation requires dynamic, initial condition modeling.
Recent ML advances enable new climate modeling opportunities.
Abstract
Modern weather and climate models share a common heritage, and often even components, however they are used in different ways to answer fundamentally different questions. As such, attempts to emulate them using machine learning should reflect this. While the use of machine learning to emulate weather forecast models is a relatively new endeavour there is a rich history of climate model emulation. This is primarily because while weather modelling is an initial condition problem which intimately depends on the current state of the atmosphere, climate modelling is predominantly a boundary condition problem. In order to emulate the response of the climate to different drivers therefore, representation of the full dynamical evolution of the atmosphere is neither necessary, or in many cases, desirable. Climate scientists are typically interested in different questions also. Indeed emulating…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
