Nonstandard analysis, deformation quantization and some logical aspects of (non)commutative algebraic geometry

TL;DR

This paper explores the interplay of nonstandard analysis, deformation quantization, and logical aspects in noncommutative algebraic geometry, highlighting recent results and open problems in the field.

Contribution

It surveys the application of model theory, nonstandard analysis, and algorithmic problems in noncommutative and commutative algebraic geometry, connecting logic with geometric structures.

Findings

Analysis of automorphisms in algebraic structures

Algorithmic undecidability in algebraic geometry problems

Application of nonstandard analysis to symplectomorphism groups

Abstract

This paper surveys results related to well-known works of B. Plotkin and V. Remeslennikov on the edge of algebra, logic and geometry. We start from a brief review of the paper and motivations. The first sections deal with model theory. In Section 2.1 we describe the geometric equivalence, the elementary equivalence, and the isotypicity of algebras. We look at these notions from the positions of universal algebraic geometry and make emphasis on the cases of the first order rigidity. In this setting Plotkin's problem on the structure of automorphisms of (auto)endomorphisms of free objects, and auto-equivalence of categories is pretty natural and important. Section 2.2 is dedicated to particular cases of Plotkin's problem. Section 2.3 is devoted to Plotkin's problem for automorphisms of the group of polynomial symplectomorphisms. This setting has applications to mathematical physics through the use of model theory (non-standard analysis) in the studying of homomorphisms between groups of symplectomorphisms and automorphisms of the Weyl algebra. The last two sections deal with algorithmic problems for noncommutative and commutative algebraic geometry. Section 3.1 is devoted to the Gr\"obner basis in non-commutative situation. Despite the existence of an algorithm for checking equalities, the zero divisors and nilpotency problems are algorithmically unsolvable. Section 3.2 is connected with the problem of embedding of algebraic varieties; a sketch of the proof of its algorithmic undecidability over a field of characteristic zero is given.