TL;DR
This paper introduces two novel methods for applying classical boundary conditions in bond-based peridynamic models, addressing a key challenge in non-local simulation of structural mechanics.
Contribution
It proposes and compares two approaches for incorporating boundary conditions into peridynamics, enhancing the model's compatibility with classical boundary treatments.
Findings
Both methods effectively impose boundary conditions in numerical experiments.
The second method ensures compatibility with local models as the horizon approaches zero.
Numerical results demonstrate the viability of the proposed approaches.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose two approaches to apply boundary conditions for bond-based peridynamic models. There has been in recent years a renewed interest in the class of so-called non-local models, which include peridynamic models, for the simulation of structural mechanics problems as an alternative approach to classical local continuum models. However, a major issue, which is often disregarded when dealing with this class of models, is concerned with the manner by which boundary conditions should be prescribed. Our point of view here is that classical boundary conditions, since applied on surfaces of solid bodies, are naturally associated with local models. The paper describes two methods to incorporate classical Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions into bond-based peridynamics. The first method consists in artificially extending the domain with a thin boundary layer over which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
