Compact galaxies and the size-mass galaxy distribution from a colour-selected sample at 0.04 < z < 0.15 supplemented by ugrizYJHK photometric redshifts
Ivan K. Baldry, Tricia Sullivan, Raffaele Rani, Sebastian Turner

TL;DR
This study uses a combined SDSS and UKIDSS photometric sample with advanced redshift estimation to analyze the size-mass distribution of galaxies, revealing significant evolution and environmental dependence of compact galaxies from high redshift to the present.
Contribution
It introduces a new colour-colour selection and photometric redshift method to identify compact galaxies, enabling a comprehensive low-redshift analysis of their distribution and evolution.
Findings
Compact galaxy number density drops by a factor of 30 from z~2 to z~0.1.
Compact galaxies are more likely in high-density environments.
The size-mass distribution shows significant evolution over cosmic time.
Abstract
The size-mass galaxy distribution is a key diagnostic for galaxy evolution. Massive compact galaxies are potential surviving relics of a high-redshift phase of star formation. Some of these could be nearly unresolved in SDSS imaging and thus not included in galaxy samples. To overcome this, a sample was selected from the combination of SDSS and UKIDSS photometry to r<17.8. This was done using colour-colour selection, and then by obtaining accurate photometric redshifts (photo-z) using scaled flux matching (SFM). Compared to spectroscopic redshifts (spec-z), SFM obtained a 1-sigma scatter of 0.0125 with only 0.3% outliers (Delta:ln(1+z)>0.06). A sample of 163186 galaxies was obtained with 0.04<z<0.15 over 2300 sq.deg. using a combination of spec-z and photo-z. Following Barro et al., log:Sigma_1.5=log:M_*-1.5log:reff was used to define compactness. The spectroscopic completeness was 76%…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
