No redshift evolution of non-repeating fast radio-burst rates
Tetsuya Hashimoto, Tomotsugu Goto, Alvina Y. L. On, Ting-Yi Lu, Daryl, Joe D. Santos, Simon C.-C. Ho, Seong Jin Kim, Ting-Wen Wang, and Tiger Y.-Y., Hsiao

TL;DR
This study finds that non-repeating FRB rates do not evolve with redshift and are linked to long-lived stellar objects, while repeating FRB rates may increase with redshift, suggesting different progenitor populations.
Contribution
First analysis of redshift evolution of FRB luminosity functions and occurrence rates, revealing distinct progenitor implications for repeating and non-repeating FRBs.
Findings
Non-repeating FRB luminosity functions show no redshift evolution.
Non-repeating FRB occurrence rates are nearly constant over 10 Gyr.
Repeating FRB rates may increase with redshift, tracking star formation or black hole activity.
Abstract
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond transients of unknown origin(s) occurring at cosmological distances. Here we, for the first time, show time-integrated-luminosity functions and volumetric occurrence rates of non-repeating and repeating FRBs against redshift. The time-integrated-luminosity functions of non-repeating FRBs do not show any significant redshift evolution. The volumetric occurrence rates are almost constant during the past 10 Gyr. The nearly-constant rate is consistent with a flat trend of cosmic stellar-mass density traced by old stellar populations. Our findings indicate that the occurrence rate of non-repeating FRBs follows the stellar-mass evolution of long-living objects with Gyr time scales, favouring e.g. white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes, as likely progenitors of non-repeating FRBs. In contrast, the occurrence rates of repeating FRBs may…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
