A charging model for the Rosetta spacecraft
F. L. Johansson, A. I. Eriksson, N. Gilet, P. Henri, G. Wattieaux, M., G. G. T. Taylor, C. Imhof, F. Cipriani

TL;DR
This study investigates the negative electrostatic potential of the Rosetta spacecraft, revealing it is mainly caused by positively biased solar array elements collecting cold plasma electrons, with implications for spacecraft design.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of spacecraft charging behavior using statistical data, simulations, and an analytical model, highlighting the role of biased elements on solar panels.
Findings
Negative spacecraft potential correlates strongly with cold plasma electron density.
Positively biased elements on solar panels are key in collecting electrons and causing negative charging.
Analytical and simulation models successfully reproduce observed charging behavior.
Abstract
Context. The electrostatic potential of a spacecraft, VS, is important for the capabilities of in situ plasma measurements. Rosetta has been found to be negatively charged during most of the comet mission and even more so in denser plasmas. Aims. Our goal is to investigate how the negative VS correlates with electron density and temperature and to understand the physics of the observed correlation. Methods. We applied full mission comparative statistics of VS, electron temperature, and electron density to establish VS dependence on cold and warm plasma density and electron temperature. We also used Spacecraft-Plasma Interaction System (SPIS) simulations and an analytical vacuum model to investigate if positively biased elements covering a fraction of the solar array surface can explain the observed correlations. Results. Here, the VS was found to depend more on electron density,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
