Experimental determination of ferric iron partitioning between pyroxene and melt at 100KPa
Avishek Rudra, Marc M. Hirschmann

TL;DR
This study experimentally measures how ferric iron partitions between pyroxene and melt at 100 KPa, revealing new data on Fe$^{3+}$ behavior and challenging existing thermodynamic models.
Contribution
It provides new experimental data on Fe$^{3+}$ partitioning in pyroxenes at controlled oxygen fugacity, highlighting discrepancies with current thermodynamic models.
Findings
Fe$^{3+}$/FeT in pyroxenes increases with fO2
Existing models over-predict Fe$^{3+}$ stability in pyroxenes
Pyroxene Fe$^{3+}$ content is lower than natural peridotites at similar conditions
Abstract
Pyroxene is the principal host of Fe in basalt source regions, hosting 79 and 81% of the Fe in spinel and garnet lherzolite, respectively, with opx and cpx hosting 48% and 31%, respectively, of the total Fe in spinel peridotite. To better understand partitioning of Fe between pyroxene and melt we conducted experiments at 100 KPa with f controlled by CO-CO gas mixes between QFM -1.19 to +2.06 in a system containing andesitic melt saturated with opx or cpx only. To produce large (100-150 m), homogeneous pyroxenes, we employed a dynamic cooling technique with a 5-10C/h cooling rate, and initial and final dwell temperatures 5-10C and 20-30C super and sub-liquidus, respectively. Resulting pyroxene crystals have absolute variation in AlO and TiO <0.05 wt.% and <0.02 wt.%, respectively. Fe/Fe in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeological and Geochemical Analysis · High-pressure geophysics and materials · earthquake and tectonic studies
