Simple Analysis of Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform under Neuroscience Constraints
Maciej Skorski

TL;DR
This paper provides a new, self-contained proof of a constrained Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma relevant to neuroscience, utilizing modern probability tools and offering explicit constants for matrices with sparsity and sign-consistency constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a novel proof leveraging sub-gaussian and sub-gamma estimates, with explicit constants, for a neuroscience-inspired constrained Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform.
Findings
New proof using modern probability techniques
Explicit constants provided for the transform
Auxiliary results on sub-gaussian variables
Abstract
The paper re-analyzes a version of the celebrated Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, in which matrices are subjected to constraints that naturally emerge from neuroscience applications: a) sparsity and b) sign-consistency. This particular variant was studied first by Allen-Zhu, Gelashvili, Micali, Shavit and more recently by Jagadeesan (RANDOM'19). The contribution of this work is a novel proof, which in contrast to previous works a) uses the modern probability toolkit, particularly basics of sub-gaussian and sub-gamma estimates b) is self-contained, with no dependencies on subtle third-party results c) offers explicit constants. At the heart of our proof is a novel variant of Hanson-Wright Lemma (on concentration of quadratic forms). Of independent interest are also auxiliary facts on sub-gaussian random variables.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Random Matrices and Applications · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
