Synergy in fertility forecasting: Improving forecast accuracy through model averaging
Han Lin Shang, Heather Booth

TL;DR
This paper explores the application of model averaging techniques to fertility forecasting, demonstrating significant accuracy improvements across multiple countries and horizons, and discusses its potential for systematic enhancement of fertility predictions.
Contribution
First application of model averaging to fertility forecasting, comparing four methods and showing substantial accuracy gains over individual models.
Findings
Average forecast accuracy improved by 4-23% for point forecasts.
Interval forecast accuracy improved by 3-24%.
Frequentist and equal-weights methods performed best at longer horizons.
Abstract
Accuracy in fertility forecasting has proved challenging and warrants renewed attention. One way to improve accuracy is to combine the strengths of a set of existing models through model averaging. The model-averaged forecast is derived using empirical model weights that optimise forecast accuracy at each forecast horizon based on historical data. We apply model averaging to fertility forecasting for the first time, using data for 17 countries and six models. Four model-averaging methods are compared: frequentist, Bayesian, model confidence set, and equal weights. We compute individual-model and model-averaged point and interval forecasts at horizons of one to 20 years. We demonstrate gains in average accuracy of 4-23\% for point forecasts and 3-24\% for interval forecasts, with greater gains from the frequentist and equal-weights approaches at longer horizons. Data for England \& Wales…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
