Parameterized Complexity of Maximum Edge Colorable Subgraph

TL;DR

This paper investigates the parameterized complexity of the Maximum Edge-Colorable Subgraph problem, providing fixed-parameter tractable algorithms and kernelization results based on various graph parameters.

Contribution

It introduces FPT algorithms for the problem using ILP, rainbow matching, and color coding, and establishes kernelization bounds related to key parameters.

Findings

FPT algorithms for vertex cover number and solution size parameters

Kernelization with O(k * p) vertices for combined parameters

No polynomial kernel of size O(k^{1-ε} * f(p)) unless NP ⊆ coNP/poly

Abstract

A graph $H$ is {\em $p$-edge colorable} if there is a coloring $\psi: E(H) \rightarrow \{1,2,\dots,p\}$, such that for distinct $uv, vw \in E(H)$, we have $\psi(uv) \neq \psi(vw)$. The {\sc Maximum Edge-Colorable Subgraph} problem takes as input a graph $G$ and integers $l$ and $p$, and the objective is to find a subgraph $H$ of $G$ and a $p$-edge-coloring of $H$, such that $|E(H)| \geq l$. We study the above problem from the viewpoint of Parameterized Complexity. We obtain \FPT\ algorithms when parameterized by: $(1)$ the vertex cover number of $G$, by using {\sc Integer Linear Programming}, and $(2)$ $l$, a randomized algorithm via a reduction to \textsc{Rainbow Matching}, and a deterministic algorithm by using color coding, and divide and color. With respect to the parameters $p+k$, where $k$ is one of the following: $(1)$ the solution size, $l$, $(2)$ the vertex cover number of $G$, and $(3)$ $l - {\mm}(G)$, where ${\mm}(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$; we show that the (decision version of the) problem admits a kernel with $\mathcal{O}(k \cdot p)$ vertices. Furthermore, we show that there is no kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^{1-\epsilon} \cdot f(p))$, for any $\epsilon > 0$ and computable function $f$, unless $\NP \subseteq \CONPpoly$.