Accelerometric Method for Cuffless Continuous Blood Pressure Measurement

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel cuffless blood pressure measurement method using accelerometric sensors to estimate LVET from seismocardiogram signals, providing accurate continuous BP monitoring without multiple sensors.

Contribution

It proposes a new approach for cuffless BP measurement using MEMS-based accelerometric sensors to estimate LVET, reducing sensor complexity compared to PTT-based methods.

Findings

Estimated BP errors within clinically acceptable range.

Performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods.

Suitable for long-term, ubiquitous BP monitoring.

Abstract

Pulse transit time (PTT) has been widely used for cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement. But, it requires more than one cardiovascular signals involving more than one sensing device. In this paper, we propose a method for continuous cuffless blood pressure measurement with the help of left ventricular ejection time (LVET). The LVET is estimated using a signal obtained through a micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based accelerometric sensor. The sensor acquires a seismocardiogram (SCG) signal at the chest surface, and the LVET information is extracted. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are estimated by calibrating the system with the original arterial blood pressure values of the subjects. The proposed method is evaluated using different quantitative measures on the signals collected from ten subjects under the supine position. The performance of the proposed method is also compared with two earlier approaches, where PTT intervals are estimated from electrocardiogram (ECG)-photoplethysmogram (PPG) and SCG-PPG, respectively. The performance results clearly show that the proposed method is comparable with the state-of-the-art methods. Also, the computed blood pressure is compared with the original one, measured through a CNAP system. It gives the mean errors of the estimated systolic BP and diastolic BP within the range of -0.19 +/- 3.3 mmHg and -1.29 +/- 2.6 mmHg, respectively. The mean absolute errors for systolic BP and diastolic BP are 3.2 mmHg and 2.6 mmHg, respectively. The accuracy of BPs estimated from the proposed method satisfies the requirements of the IEEE standard of 5 +/- 8 mmHg deviation, and thus, it may be used for ubiquitous long term blood pressure monitoring.