The Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5): Chemical Abundances of Seven Stellar Streams
Alexander P. Ji, Ting S. Li, Terese T. Hansen, Andrew R. Casey, Sergey, E. Koposov, Andrew B. Pace, Dougal Mackey, Geraint F. Lewis, Jeffrey D., Simpson, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Lara R. Cullinane, Gary. S. Da Costa, Kohei, Hattori, Sarah L. Martell, Kyler Kuehn, Denis Erkal

TL;DR
This study provides detailed chemical abundance measurements for stars in seven stellar streams, revealing their origins as disrupted globular clusters or dwarf galaxies and introducing a new method for analyzing stellar parameters.
Contribution
It offers the most extensive element abundance dataset for stellar streams and introduces a novel approach to account for stellar parameter correlations in abundance analysis.
Findings
Three streams are disrupted globular clusters with weak light element anticorrelations.
Four streams originate from dwarf galaxies with progenitor masses of 10^6-10^7 solar masses.
The new analysis method improves the accuracy of stellar abundance uncertainties.
Abstract
We present high-resolution Magellan/MIKE spectroscopy of 42 red giant stars in seven stellar streams confirmed by the Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5): ATLAS, Aliqa Uma, Chenab, Elqui, Indus, Jhelum, and Phoenix. Abundances of 30 elements have been derived from over 10,000 individual line measurements or upper limits using photometric stellar parameters and a standard LTE analysis. This is currently the most extensive set of element abundances for stars in stellar streams. Three streams (ATLAS, Aliqa Uma, and Phoenix) are disrupted metal-poor globular clusters, although only weak evidence is seen for the light element anticorrelations commonly observed in globular clusters. Four streams (Chenab, Elqui, Indus, and Jhelum) are disrupted dwarf galaxies, and their stars display abundance signatures that suggest progenitors with stellar masses ranging from $10^6-10^7…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
