TL;DR
This paper evaluates machine learning methods for estimating individual survival treatment effects in observational data, highlighting the superior performance of AFT-BART-NP in various simulation settings and a real case study.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive simulation comparison of survival treatment effect estimators and demonstrates the effectiveness of AFT-BART-NP with practical applications.
Findings
AFT-BART-NP consistently outperforms other methods in bias and precision.
Credible intervals from AFT-BART-NP achieve near-nominal coverage under moderate covariate overlap.
Including estimated propensity scores improves AFT-BART-NP efficiency and coverage.
Abstract
Methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effect in observational data have largely focused on continuous or binary outcomes, and have been relatively less vetted with survival outcomes. Using flexible machine learning methods in the counterfactual framework is a promising approach to address challenges due to complex individual characteristics, to which treatments need to be tailored. To evaluate the operating characteristics of recent survival machine learning methods for the estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity and inform better practice, we carry out a comprehensive simulation study presenting a wide range of settings describing confounded heterogeneous survival treatment effects and varying degrees of covariate overlap. Our results suggest that the nonparametric Bayesian Additive Regression Trees within the framework of accelerated failure time model (AFT-BART-NP)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsCausal inference
