Enforcing Safety at Runtime for Systems with Disturbances
Matthew Abate, Samuel Coogan

TL;DR
This paper develops a runtime safety assurance framework for control systems with disturbances using control barrier functions and efficient reachable set approximations based on mixed-monotonicity.
Contribution
It introduces a novel formulation for CBF-based safety assurance in disturbed systems and proposes an efficient approximation method for reachable sets using mixed-monotonicity.
Findings
Reachable set approximation via mixed-monotonicity is effective for disturbed systems.
The proposed method enables real-time safety assurance with computational efficiency.
The framework extends existing CBF approaches to systems with unknown disturbances.
Abstract
Safety for control systems is often posed as an invariance constraint; the system is said to be safe if state trajectories avoid some unsafe region of the statespace for all time. An assured controller is one that enforces safety online by filtering a desired control input at runtime, and control barrier functions (CBFs) provide an assured controller that renders a safe subset of the state-space forward invariant. Recent extensions propose CBF-based assured controllers that allow the system to leave a known safe set so long as a given backup control strategy eventually returns to the safe set, however, these methods have yet to be extended to consider systems subjected to unknown disturbance inputs. In this work, we present a problem formulation for CBF-based runtime assurance for systems with disturbances, and controllers which solve this problem must, in some way, incorporate the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
