Are Smart Home Devices Abandoning IPV Victims?
Ahmed Alshehri, Malek Ben Salem, and Lei Ding

TL;DR
This paper systematically analyzes how smart home devices can facilitate domestic abuse, highlighting risks, current limitations, and proposing design properties for abuse-resistant devices to better protect IPV victims.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of tech-abuse in smart homes, categorizes abuse phases, evaluates current technologies, and proposes design principles for safer smart home devices.
Findings
Smart homes can increase abuse effectiveness and reduce victim safety.
Current technologies have significant limitations in preventing tech-abuse.
Recommendations often conflict due to lack of understanding of abuse phases.
Abstract
Smart home devices have brought us many benefits such as advanced security, convenience, and entertainment. However, these devices also have made unintended consequences like giving ultimate power for devices' owners over their intimate partners in the same household which might lead to tech-facilitated domestic abuse (tech-abuse) as recent research has shown. In this paper, we systematize findings on tech-abuse in smart homes. We show that domestic abuse and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in smart homes is more effective and less risky for abusers. Victims find it more harmful and more challenging to protect themselves from. We articulate a comprehensive analysis of all the phases of abuse in smart homes and categorize risks and needs in each phase. Technical analysis of current smart home technologies is conducted to shed light upon their limitations. We also summarize recent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
