TL;DR
This paper introduces new fine-grained average-case hardness assumptions for problems like OV, $k$SUM, and zero-$k$-clique, and demonstrates their implications for the complexity of various computational problems.
Contribution
It defines factored versions of classical problems, establishes their equivalences and completeness, and connects them to average-case hardness of other problems via reductions.
Findings
Factored-$k$-OV and factored-$k$-SUM are equivalent and complete for certain Boolean function classes.
Factored zero-$k$-clique is complete for a different class of problems.
Average-case hardness results extend to problems like regular expression matching through new reductions.
Abstract
The recent emergence of fine-grained cryptography strongly motivates developing an average-case analogue of Fine-Grained Complexity (FGC). This paper defines new versions of OV, SUM and zero--clique that are both worst-case and average-case fine-grained hard assuming the core hypotheses of FGC. We then use these as a basis for fine-grained hardness and average-case hardness of other problems. The new problems represent their inputs in a certain ``factored'' form. We call them ``factored''-OV, ``factored''-zero--clique and ``factored''-SUM. We show that factored--OV and factored SUM are equivalent and are complete for a class of problems defined over Boolean functions. Factored zero--clique is also complete, for a different class of problems. Our hard factored problems are also simple enough that we can reduce them to many other problems, e.g.~to edit distance,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
New Techniques For Proving Fine-Grained Average-Case Hardness· youtube
