Perturbation theory for modeling galaxy bias: validation with simulations of the Dark Energy Survey
S. Pandey, E. Krause, B. Jain, N. MacCrann, J. Blazek, M. Crocce, J., DeRose, X. Fang, I. Ferrero, O. Friedrich, M. Aguena, S. Allam, J. Annis, S., Avila, G. M. Bernstein, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M., Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, M. Costanzi, L. N. da Costa

TL;DR
This paper develops and validates a perturbation theory model for galaxy bias using simulations tailored for the Dark Energy Survey, achieving accurate correlation function predictions above 4 Mpc/h scales.
Contribution
The paper introduces a five-parameter effective perturbation theory model for galaxy bias that is validated against DES mock catalogs, demonstrating high accuracy on relevant scales.
Findings
Model describes correlation functions within 2% accuracy.
Two bias parameters can be fixed based on co-evolution assumptions.
Using the full non-linear matter power spectrum improves model fit.
Abstract
We describe perturbation theory (PT) models of galaxy bias for applications to photometric galaxy surveys. We model the galaxy-galaxy and galaxy-matter correlation functions in configuration space and validate against measurements from mock catalogs designed for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We find that an effective PT model with five galaxy bias parameters provides a good description of the 3D correlation functions above scales of 4 Mpc/ and . Our tests show that at the projected precision of the DES-Year 3 analysis, two of the non-linear bias parameters can be fixed to their co-evolution values, and a third (the term for higher derivative bias) set to zero. The agreement is typically at the 2 percent level over scales of interest, which is the statistical uncertainty of our simulation measurements. To achieve this level of agreement, our {\it fiducial} model requires…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
