On seat allocation problem with multiple merit lists
Rahul Kumar Singh, Sanjeev Saxena

TL;DR
This paper introduces a straightforward, transparent algorithm for joint seat allocation with multiple merit lists, improving efficiency and trust in systems like India's engineering seat allocation.
Contribution
It proposes a simple, natural algorithm for multiple merit list seat allocation that is not based on deferred acceptance, enhancing transparency and efficiency.
Findings
Algorithm's running time is proportional to sum of separate allocations
Algorithm is straightforward and transparent
Applicable to systems with multiple merit lists
Abstract
In this note, we present a simpler algorithm for joint seat allocation problem in case there are two or more merit lists. In case of two lists (the current situation for Engineering seats in India), the running time of the algorithm is proportional to sum of running time for two separate (delinked) allocations. The algorithm is straight forward and natural and is not (at least directly) based on deferred acceptance algorithm of Gale and Shapley. Each person can only move higher in his or her preference list. Thus, all steps of the algorithm can be made public. This will improve transparency and trust in the system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Optimization and Search Problems
