Local well-posedness for quasilinear problems: a primer
Mihaela Ifrim, Daniel Tataru

TL;DR
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of methods and ideas for establishing local well-posedness in quasilinear PDEs, clarifying misconceptions and offering a adaptable framework for researchers.
Contribution
It compiles classical and recent techniques into a cohesive guide for proving local well-posedness in quasilinear problems, addressing common misconceptions.
Findings
Clarifies universal and problem-specific difficulties in proving well-posedness.
Summarizes classical and modern approaches in a unified framework.
Provides adaptable methods for various quasilinear PDEs.
Abstract
Proving local well-posedness for quasilinear problems in pde's presents a number of difficulties, some of which are universal and others of which are more problem specific. While a common standard, going back to Hadamard, has existed for a long time, there are by now both many variations and many misconceptions in the subject. The aim of these notes is to collect a number of both classical and more recent ideas in this direction, and to assemble them into a cohesive road map that can be then adapted to the reader's problem of choice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
