StarTrack predictions of the stochastic gravitational-wave background from compact binary mergers
C. P\'erigois, C. Belczynski, T. Bulik, T. Regimbau

TL;DR
This paper models the stochastic gravitational-wave background from compact binary mergers across cosmic time using the StarTrack code, accounting for different stellar populations and orbital eccentricities, and assesses its detectability with current and future detectors.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed predictions of the gravitational-wave background including population III stars and eccentricity effects, using the StarTrack population synthesis model.
Findings
The background energy density at 25 Hz is about 1.0 x 10^{-9}, detectable within 7 years with current detectors.
Population III stars contribute significantly to the residual background in 3G detectors.
Eccentricity has negligible impact on the gravitational-wave spectrum in the LISA and ground-based detector bands.
Abstract
We model the gravitational-wave background created by double compact objects from isolated binary evolution across cosmic time using the \textbf{\textit{StarTrack}} binary population code. We include population I/II stars as well as metal-free population III stars. Merging and non-merging double compact object binaries are taken into account. In order to model the low frequency signal in the band of the space antenna LISA, we account for the evolution of the redshift and the eccentricity. We find an energy density of at the reference frequency of 25 Hz for population I/II only, making the background detectable at 3 after about 7 years of observation with the current generation of ground based detectors, such as LIGO, Virgo and Kagra, operating at design sensitivity. The contribution from population III is one order of magnitude below the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
