Physicochemical models: source-tailored or generic?
Beatrice M. Kulterer, Maria N. Drozdovskaya, Audrey Coutens,, S\'ebastien Manigand, Gwendoline St\'ephan

TL;DR
This study compares source-tailored and generic physicochemical models to determine their effectiveness in explaining molecular abundances in young protostars, finding physical conditions have a greater impact than chemical details.
Contribution
It demonstrates that physical conditions dominate chemical outcomes, suggesting generic models are sufficient for understanding early star formation chemistry.
Findings
Physical conditions significantly influence molecular abundances.
Chemical model differences have minor impact compared to physical parameters.
Generic models facilitate comparative studies across star-forming regions.
Abstract
Physicochemical models can be powerful tools to trace the chemical evolution of a protostellar system and allow to constrain its physical conditions at formation. The aim of this work is to assess whether source-tailored modelling is needed to explain the observed molecular abundances around young, low-mass protostars or if, and to what extent, generic models can improve our understanding of the chemistry in the earliest stages of star formation. The physical conditions and the abundances of simple, most abundant molecules based on three models are compared. After establishing the discrepancies between the calculated chemical output, the calculations are redone with the same chemical model for all three sets of physical input parameters. With the differences arising from the chemical models eliminated, the output is compared based on the influence of the physical model. Results suggest…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
