Subnormal $n$th roots of quasinormal operators are quasinormal
Pawe{\l} Pietrzycki, Jan Stochel

TL;DR
This paper proves that subnormal operators whose nth roots are quasinormal must themselves be quasinormal, answering a specific open question and extending the understanding of operator properties.
Contribution
It establishes that subnormal nth roots of quasinormal operators are necessarily quasinormal, generalizing previous results and answering an open question.
Findings
Subnormal nth roots of quasinormal operators are quasinormal.
Affirmative answer to a previously open question.
Generalization to nth roots beyond squares.
Abstract
In the recent paper, R. E. Curto, S. H. Lee, J. Yoon, asked the following question: Let be a subnormal operator, and assume that is quasinormal. Does it follow that is quasinormal? In this paper, we give an affirmative answer to this question. In fact, we prove more general result that subnormal th roots of quasinormal operators are quasinormal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
