Towards a more realistic citation model: The key role of research team sizes
Sta\v{s}a Milojevi\'c

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new citation model emphasizing the influence of research team sizes, showing that larger teams tend to have higher initial visibility and citation counts, aligning well with empirical data in astronomy.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel citation model where the probability of direct citation is proportional to team size, improving the realism of citation dynamics modeling.
Findings
The model accurately reproduces empirical citation distributions in astronomy.
Larger research teams have higher initial citation probabilities.
Citation counts are correlated with the number of authors, following a power-law distribution.
Abstract
We propose a new citation model which builds on the existing models that explicitly or implicitly include "direct" and "indirect" (learning about a cited paper's existence from references in another paper) citation mechanisms. Our model departs from the usual, unrealistic assumption of uniform probability of direct citation, in which initial differences in citation arise purely randomly. Instead, we demonstrate that a two-mechanism model in which the probability of direct citation is proportional to the number of authors on a paper (team size) is able to reproduce the empirical citation distributions of articles published in the field of astronomy remarkably well, and at different points in time. Interpretation of our model is that the intrinsic citation capacity, and hence the initial visibility of a paper, will be enhanced when more people are intimately familiar with some work,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
