Water worlds in N-body simulations with fragmentation in systems without gaseous giants
Agust\'in Dugaro, Gonzalo C. de El\'ia, Luciano A. Darriba

TL;DR
This study uses N-body simulations with and without planetary fragmentation to investigate the formation of water-rich terrestrial planets in the habitable zone around solar-type stars, revealing that fragmentation influences planetary mass and eccentricity but not water content.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative N-body simulation approach incorporating planetary fragmentation and hit-and-run collisions, providing new insights into planet formation dynamics without gaseous giants.
Findings
Formed planets in simulations have lower masses with fragmentation.
Planets in the habitable zone often start beyond the snow line with high water content.
Fragment contribution to mass and water is negligible.
Abstract
We analyze the formation and evolution of terrestrial-like planets around solar-type stars in the absence of gaseous giants. In particular, we focus on the physical and dynamical properties of those that survive in the system's Habitable Zone (HZ). This study is based on a comparative study between N-body simulations that include fragmentation and others that consider all collisions as perfect mergers. We use an N-body code, presented in a previous paper, that allows planetary fragmentation. We carry out three sets of 24 simulations for 400 Myr. Two sets are developed adopting a model that includes hit-and-run collisions and planetary fragmentation, each one with different values of the individual minimum mass allowed for the fragments. For the third set, we considered that all collisions lead to perfect mergers. The systems produced in N-body simulations with and without fragmentation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
