Respecting One's Fellow: QBism's Analysis of Wigner's Friend
John B. DeBrota, Christopher A. Fuchs, and Ruediger Schack

TL;DR
This paper uses QBism to resolve Wigner's friend paradoxes by treating all agents equally, emphasizing personal experiences and judgments, and removing paradoxical features in modified thought experiments.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Wigner's friend paradoxes dissolve when both agents are modeled as equals with personal quantum judgments, offering a new perspective within QBism.
Findings
Wigner's action on his friend is reciprocal from the friend's perspective.
Paradoxical features in recent no-go theorems disappear under QBist interpretation.
All agents are on equal footing, with no privileged perspective in quantum theory.
Abstract
According to QBism, quantum states, unitary evolutions, and measurement operators are all understood as personal judgments of the agent using the formalism. Meanwhile, quantum measurement outcomes are understood as the personal experiences of the same agent. Wigner's conundrum of the friend, in which two agents ostensibly have different accounts of whether or not there is a measurement outcome, thus poses no paradox for QBism. Indeed the resolution of Wigner's original thought experiment was central to the development of QBist thinking. The focus of this paper concerns two very instructive modifications to Wigner's puzzle: One, a recent no-go theorem by Frauchiger and Renner, and the other a thought experiment by Baumann and Brukner. We show that the paradoxical features emphasized in these works disappear once both friend and Wigner are understood as agents on an equal footing with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
