How good is the bipolar approximation of active regions for surface flux transport?
A. R. Yeates

TL;DR
This study assesses the accuracy of bipolar magnetic region approximations in surface flux transport models, revealing a 24% overestimation of the axial dipole moment due to neglecting complex magnetic structures.
Contribution
It introduces a new BMR database derived from SDO/HMI data and quantifies the overestimation caused by bipolar approximation in flux transport models.
Findings
Bipolar approximation overestimates axial dipole moment by 24%.
Complex magnetic structures of active regions impact flux transport predictions.
The new BMR database and Python tools are publicly available.
Abstract
We investigate how representing active regions with bipolar magnetic regions (BMRs) affects the end-of-cycle polar field predicted by the surface flux transport model. Our study is based on a new database of BMRs derived from the SDO/HMI active region patch data between 2010 and 2020. An automated code is developed for fitting each active region patch with a BMR, matching both the magnetic flux and axial dipole moment of the region and removing repeat observations of the same region. By comparing the predicted evolution of each of the 1090 BMRs with the predicted evolution of their original active region patches, we show that the bipolar approximation leads to a 24% overestimate of the net axial dipole moment, given the same flow parameters. This is caused by neglecting the more complex multipolar and/or asymmetric magnetic structures of many of the real active regions, and may explain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
