Climate and structure of the 8.2 ka event reconstructed from three speleothems from Germany

TL;DR

This study reconstructs the 8.2 ka climate event in central Europe using high-resolution speleothem data, revealing its structure, timing, and potential links to North Atlantic climate variability.

Contribution

It provides detailed speleothem-based climate reconstructions of the 8.2 ka event, highlighting differences in proxy responses and their implications for understanding regional climate impacts.

Findings

The 8.2 ka event shows a consistent negative δ18O excursion in all speleothems.

Timing and duration of the event vary among records, possibly due to dating uncertainties.

δ13C and Mg proxies do not show clear signals in some speleothems, indicating complex climate responses.

Abstract

The most pronounced climate anomaly of the Holocene was the 8.2 ka cooling event. We present new 230Th/U-ages as well as high-resolution stable isotope and trace element data from three stalagmitesfrom two different cave systems in Germany, which provide important information about the structure and climate variability of the 8.2 ka event in central Europe. In all three speleothems, the 8.2 ka event is clearly recorded as a pronounced negative excursion of the {\delta}18O values and can be divided into a 'whole event' and a 'central event'. All stalagmites show a similar structure of the event with a short negative excursion prior to the 'central event', which marks the beginning of the 'whole event'. The timing and duration of the 8.2.ka event are different for the individual records, which may, however, be related to dating uncertainties. Whereas stalagmite Bu4 from Bunker Cave also shows a negative anomaly in the {\delta}13C values and Mg content during the event, the two speleothems from the Herbstlabyrinth cave system do not show distinct peaks in the other proxies. This may suggest that the speleothem {\delta}18O values recorded in the three stalagmites do not primarily reflect climate change at the cave site, but rather large-scale changes in the North Atlantic. This is supported by comparison with climate modelling data, which suggest that the negative peak in the speleothem {\delta}18O values is mainly due to lower {\delta}18O values of precipitation above the cave and that temperature only played a minor role. Alternatively, the other proxies may not be as sensitive as {\delta}18O values to record this centennial-scale cooling event. This may particularly be the case for speleothem {\delta}13C values as suggested by comparison with a climate modelling study simulating vegetation changes in Europe during the 8.2 ka event. ...